On (31/08/16 08:28), Petr Cech wrote:
>From b3ae463a7544bb9561126c5e05475d5b98928edc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>From: Petr Cech <pc...@example.com>
>Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 14:54:35 +0200
>Subject: [PATCH] LDAP: Improving debug message
>
>There were debug messges refering to user by for loop variable.
>We might obtain user name and refer to user by this.
>---
> src/providers/ldap/sdap_async_users.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>diff --git a/src/providers/ldap/sdap_async_users.c 
>b/src/providers/ldap/sdap_async_users.c
>index 
>87d91d8247c37a4c6a1d83b7189399056528fc90..17d8680d82b25946e975034b852e24fcb731b535
> 100644
>--- a/src/providers/ldap/sdap_async_users.c
>+++ b/src/providers/ldap/sdap_async_users.c
>@@ -540,6 +540,7 @@ int sdap_save_users(TALLOC_CTX *memctx,
>                     char **_usn_value)
> {
>     TALLOC_CTX *tmpctx;
>+    const char *user_name = NULL;
>     char *higher_usn = NULL;
>     char *usn_value;
>     int ret;
>@@ -569,14 +570,30 @@ int sdap_save_users(TALLOC_CTX *memctx,
>     for (i = 0; i < num_users; i++) {
>         usn_value = NULL;
> 
>+        ret = sdap_get_user_primary_name(memctx, opts, users[i],
>+                                         dom, &user_name);
>+        if (ret != EOK) {
>+            user_name = NULL;
>+        }
>+
>         ret = sdap_save_user(tmpctx, opts, dom, users[i], &usn_value, now);
> 
>         /* Do not fail completely on errors.
>          * Just report the failure to save and go on */
>         if (ret) {
>-            DEBUG(SSSDBG_OP_FAILURE, "Failed to store user %d. Ignoring.\n", 
>i);
>+            if (user_name != NULL) {
>+               DEBUG(SSSDBG_OP_FAILURE, "Failed to store user %s. 
>Ignoring.\n",
>+                                        user_name);
>+            } else {
>+                DEBUG(SSSDBG_OP_FAILURE, "Failed to store user %d. 
>Ignoring.\n",
>+                                          i);
>+            }
>         } else {
>-            DEBUG(SSSDBG_TRACE_ALL, "User %d processed!\n", i);
>+            if (user_name != NULL) {
>+                DEBUG(SSSDBG_TRACE_ALL, "User %s processed!\n", user_name);
>+            } else {
>+                DEBUG(SSSDBG_TRACE_ALL, "User %d processed!\n", i);
>+            }
>         }
I do not think that this patch improves anything.
Could you describe a use-case?

BTW W already log a message in sdap_save_user(<-singular)
e.g.
(Wed Aug 31 09:30:02 2016) [sssd[be[example.com]]] [sdap_get_primary_name] 
(0x0400): Processing object pcech
(Wed Aug 31 09:30:02 2016) [sssd[be[example.com]]] [sdap_save_user] (0x0400): 
Processing user pc...@example.com
(Wed Aug 31 09:30:02 2016) [sssd[be[example.com]]] [is_email_from_domain] 
(0x4000): Email [pc...@example.com] is from domain [example.com]
(Wed Aug 31 09:30:02 2016) [sssd[be[example.com]]] [sdap_save_user] (0x0400): 
Storing info for user pc...@example.com

And we log message there as soon as possible.
We cannot get a name earlier in the function.

LS
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to