On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 15:19 +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Pavel Březina <pbrez...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On 11/24/2016 02:33 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote:
> >> The design page is done  and it's based on this discussion  we
> >> had on this very same mailing list. A pull-request with the
> >> implementation is already opened .
> >> :
> >> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/SocketActivatableResponders
> >> :
> >> https://firstname.lastname@example.org/message/H6JOF5SGGSIJUIWYNANDA73ODHWBS7J2/
> >> : htatps://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/84
> > I think we should also provide 'disabled_services' option, to give admins a
> > way to explicitly disable some responders if the don't want to used them.
> I have to double check a few things here but, AFAIU, just having the
> socket disabled (systemctl disable sssd-@responder@.socket) should be
I guess I misunderstood what ou mean by "provide 'disabled_services'
option", I though you wanted to add that option to sssd.conf
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York
sssd-devel mailing list -- email@example.com
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org