On Thu, 2016-12-01 at 15:19 +0100, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Pavel Březina <pbrez...@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 11/24/2016 02:33 PM, Fabiano Fidêncio wrote: > >> > >> The design page is done  and it's based on this discussion  we > >> had on this very same mailing list. A pull-request with the > >> implementation is already opened . > >> > >> : > >> https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/wiki/DesignDocs/SocketActivatableResponders > >> : > >> https://firstname.lastname@example.org/message/H6JOF5SGGSIJUIWYNANDA73ODHWBS7J2/ > >> : htatps://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/84 > > > > > > I think we should also provide 'disabled_services' option, to give admins a > > way to explicitly disable some responders if the don't want to used them. > > I have to double check a few things here but, AFAIU, just having the > socket disabled (systemctl disable sssd-@responder@.socket) should be > enough.
I guess I misunderstood what ou mean by "provide 'disabled_services' option", I though you wanted to add that option to sssd.conf Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York _______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list -- email@example.com To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org