URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107 Title: #107: WATCHDOG: Avoid non async-signal-safe from the signal_handler
fidencio commented: """ On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 3:37 PM, Jakub Hrozek <[email protected]> wrote: > So..I wonder how much of a hack this is but if the intent here is to reset > the watchdog from a signal handler, could we send a signal to self > (kill(getpid(), > SIGHUP)) with a signal that is handled by tevent and in that > tevent-driven signal handler, reset the watchdog? > Things are getting more and more hacky. I'm wondering here, what would be the problem to simply `_exit(1)` in case of a timeshift is detected? > — > You are receiving this because you authored the thread. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107#issuecomment-266446340>, or mute > the thread > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAG4enqr9bqncI7VM76uw-d4O9L1-INtks5rHVwdgaJpZM4LKVED> > . > """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/107#issuecomment-266447493
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
