URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/250
Title: #250: cache_req: Use ternary operator instead of bool+switch

lslebodn commented:
"""
> No, it was decided that just other people like the if more, not that it is 
> more readable.

If they they like it more then it is more readable.

>Remember that forcing your opinion on a NACK will be taken into consideration 
>when you'll be NACKing something ... (which is fine by me, but may not be for 
>you).

If I saw switch + bool earlier you would request change as part of review. But 
I do not have a resources to review all patches these days due to other tasks. 
And in this case, your NACK does not count because there are 3 other developers 
which prefer different version. (3 vs 1) Sorry democracy works. The same 
applies to any other developer(including me) NACK cannot beet 3+ developers :-)
Because reasonable NACK with proper explanation would persuade them.


"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/250#issuecomment-297930326
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to