On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 01:30:17PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (21/09/17 13:22), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >clients. But I thought krb5.conf should also contain only the local
> >master..does the config file in the issue you saw contain something
> >else?
> >
> >I mean, if we revert the patch and krb5.conf contains no records or multiple
> >records, then I think the libkrb5 configuration is broken and we are relying
> >on sssd injecting a valid value into an otherwise invalid krb5 configuration.
> >
> 
> I'm waiting for machine to see content of krb5.conf and then I'll check
> Sumit's assumption.

I also wonder if the bug might be in IPv4/IPv6 resolution. Because IIRC
libc prefers IPv6 addresses during resulution, but SSSD prefers IPv4 and
the kdcinfo file would contain a v4 address.

But then I guess reverting the patch and injecting the kdcinfo file
would help..
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org

Reply via email to