URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/837
Title: #837: p11_child: make OCSP digest configurable

dpward commented:
"""
@alexey-tikhonov @sumit-bose I think you are getting a few things confused here.

The FIPS requirement you referenced is for **cryptographic** hashes. For 
example: an [OCSP response 
message](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6960#section-2.2) contains a "signature 
computed across a hash of the response", which involves the use of a private 
key.

The change made here did not affect _cryptographic_ hashes. An OCSP request 
message needs to specify the issuing CA for the certificate in question. Rather 
than send the full distinguished name in plain text, it is sent in the form of 
a hash (think `sha1sum`). This change made it possible to choose the hash 
algorithm.

Now, note that some OCSP responders (including Microsoft's) implement RFC 5019, 
which places restrictions on how OCSP is used. [Section 
2.1.1](https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5019#section-2.1.1) states that for OCSP 
requests,
```
   Clients MUST use SHA1 as the hashing algorithm for the
   CertID.issuerNameHash and the CertID.issuerKeyHash values.
```
So using hash algorithms other than SHA-1 here breaks compatibility with RFC 
5019-compliant responders, which may refuse to even process the request (as we 
are in fact seeing).

The algorithm should remain a configuration option, but the default should be 
reverted to SHA-1, which satisfies RFC 5019 in case that is what the OCSP 
responder implements. Again: this is not being used to produce a 
_cryptographic_ hash.

(Also note that when SSSD is built with NSS support, the default algorithm is 
already SHA-1, because others are unsupported.)
"""

See the full comment at 
https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/837#issuecomment-673709907
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]

Reply via email to