URL: https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5683 Title: #5683: Fix log levels
alexey-tikhonov commented: """ > As a general question, not related to the patch. Do you think it would be > worth to add a flag for debug messages where a backtrace is not needed? E.g. > for cases where something is not implemented or supported it might be still > worth to have this information on the default log level but a backtrace is > not needed. `information on the default log level but a backtrace is not needed` - this looks like a description of existing `SSSDBG_IMPORTANT_INFO` log level. I will update PR to make use of it for `ERR_KCM_OP_NOT_IMPLEMENTED`, thank you. """ See the full comment at https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/pull/5683#issuecomment-861500151
_______________________________________________ sssd-devel mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
