On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 6:26 PM Andreas Hasenack <andr...@canonical.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm troubleshooting a set of test failures[1][2] in sssd 2.9.2 and
> 2.9.4. They are only failing in armhf, so the usual culprits are
> 32bits, slowness of the arch/infrastructure, and now we also have a
> time_t change[3] to a 64bit type.
+ unaligned mem access, but hardly the case here.
> I don't know yet which, if any, are
> related to the failures.
>
> The current failures are:
>
> [ RUN ] test_user_by_recent_filter_valid
> [ ERROR ] --- 0x2 != 0x1
> [ LINE ] --- ../src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c:2505:
> error: Failure!
> [ FAILED ] test_user_by_recent_filter_valid
> [ RUN ] test_users_by_recent_filter_valid
> [ OK ] test_users_by_recent_filter_valid
> [ RUN ] test_group_by_recent_filter_valid
> [ ERROR ] --- 0x2 != 0x1
> [ LINE ] --- ../src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c:2868:
> error: Failure!
> [ FAILED ] test_group_by_recent_filter_valid
> [ RUN ] test_groups_by_recent_filter_valid
> [ OK ] test_groups_by_recent_filter_valid
> [ RUN ] test_users_by_filter_filter_old
> [ ERROR ] --- 0x2 != 0x1
> [ LINE ] --- ../src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c:2613:
> error: Failure!
> [ FAILED ] test_users_by_filter_filter_old
>
> And
>
> [ ERROR ] --- No entries for symbol sss_dp_get_account_recv.
> ../src/tests/cmocka/common_mock_resp_dp.c:52: error: Could not get
> value to mock function sss_dp_get_account_recv
> ../src/tests/cmocka/test_pam_srv.c:802: note: Previously returned mock
> value was declared here
>
> [ FAILED ] test_pam_preauth_expired_crl_file
> ...
> [ ERROR ] --- No entries for symbol sss_dp_get_account_recv.
> ../src/tests/cmocka/common_mock_resp_dp.c:52: error: Could not get
> value to mock function sss_dp_get_account_recv
> ../src/tests/cmocka/test_pam_srv.c:802: note: Previously returned mock
> value was declared here
>
> [ FAILED ] test_pam_preauth_crl_another_ca_crl_invalid_files
> [ RUN ] test_pam_preauth_crl_invalid_crl_another_ca_files
> [ ERROR ] --- No entries for symbol sss_dp_get_account_recv.
> ../src/tests/cmocka/common_mock_resp_dp.c:52: error: Could not get
> value to mock function sss_dp_get_account_recv
> ../src/tests/cmocka/test_pam_srv.c:802: note: Previously returned mock
> value was declared here
>
> [ FAILED ] test_pam_preauth_crl_invalid_crl_another_ca_files
>
> At first, I've been trying to understand
> test_user_by_recent_filter_valid()[4], and it seems to be the reason
> for all 3 failures in that test group.
>
> The failure is that it expects just one user to be returned, but in
> the end there are two.
I would print the content of `test_ctx->result` at this point just to
debug / see what's there...
> The test seems to prepare two users,
Why?
```
test_ctx->create_user1 = true;
test_ctx->create_user2 = false;
```
> but in the
> end only one should be returned by the filter. I have not yet
> understood what is being expected here. What's "recent" in this
> context? Is it related to the "one second ago" (time(NULL) -1) in
> prepare_user()?
>
>
>
> 1. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sssd/+bug/2058576
> 2. https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1068063
> 3. https://wiki.debian.org/ReleaseGoals/64bit-time
> 4.
> https://github.com/SSSD/sssd/blob/1c2aa825062dcf2da2e886c3211be90c22db1750/src/tests/cmocka/test_responder_cache_req.c#L2467
> --
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list -- sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
To unsubscribe send an email to sssd-devel-le...@lists.fedorahosted.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
