Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 05:47:52PM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> many new features rely on library APIs and features that are only available
>> in recent versions of SSSD dependencies. As a result, the code often needs
>> #ifdefs and special branches in order to at least compile or run on RHEL5.
>>
>> So far we've been doing nightly builds also for RHEL5 and fixing issues
>> as we were finding them. But recently we are considering dropping support
>> for RHEL5 -- it is causing some engineering effort and at the same time
>> the audience is probably very limited. If you are running super-stable
>> enterprise distribution, chances are you are not all that interested in
>> the latest and possibly very unstable SSSD version.
>>
>> The proposal would be to keep building and supporting the 1.9.x branch
>> for RHEL5 and switch to using RHEL6 as the oldest supported release
>> starting from the 1.10 upstream version. Of course we would still accept
>> patches from any potential contributors.
>>
>> Any objections against the plan?
> 
> I'm about to discontinue RHEL5 builds of master/1.10 unless there is
> an objection.
> 
> The recent changes in the 1.10/master branch make it harder and harder to
> support such an old platform without substatial effort and I don't really
> think there are many users of bleeding edge SSSD on a stable platform.
> 
> If there are no objections I will shut down the RHEL5 nightly builds
> of the master branch tomorrow.

I understand that you want to get rid of the additional effort.

Would you be still willing to accept a feature request for 1.9.x?
I'd like to use LDAP SASL/EXTERNAL bind with SSL client certs.

> Our current nightly builder doesn't support building from different
> branches for different "targets", so in order to build sssd-1-9
> nightlies for RHEL5, I'd have to set up another repo. Is anyone
> interested in running sssd-1-9 on RHEL5? If so, then I could set up a
> new repo, probably on repos.fedorapeople.org or someplace similar.

My customer is definitely stuck to still using RHEL5 for a while but we plan
to use 1.9.5+ on that platform.

Ciao, Mcihael.

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users

Reply via email to