On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 05:50:10PM +0000, Chris Petty wrote:
> 
> I guess i naively thought i needed it, but i removed the pam_krb libs from 
> all the system/password auth sections of test machines and things still work 
> as normal.
> 
> I still get the same errors on the ro-root machine however:
> 
> Oct 31 13:37:13 node48 sshd[5983]: pam_sss(sshd:auth): authentication 
> success; logname= uid=0 euid=0 tty=ssh ruser= rhost=hugin.biac.duke.edu 
> user=cmp12
> Oct 31 13:37:13 node48 sshd[5983]: debug1: PAM: password authentication 
> accepted for cmp12
> Oct 31 13:37:13 node48 sshd[5983]: debug1: do_pam_account: called
> Oct 31 13:37:13 node48 sshd[5907]: debug2: channel 0: rcvd adjust 49852
> Oct 31 13:37:15 node48 sshd[5983]: pam_sss(sshd:account): Access denied for 
> user cmp12: 4 (System error)
> Oct 31 13:37:15 node48 sshd[5983]: Failed password for cmp12 from 10.136.52.5 
> port 38218 ssh2
> Oct 31 13:37:15 node48 sshd[5984]: fatal: Access denied for user cmp12 by PAM 
> account configuration
> 
> 
> (Thu Oct 31 13:48:12 2013) [sssd[be[default]]] 
> [sdap_access_filter_get_access_done] (0x0400): Access granted by online lookup
> (Thu Oct 31 13:48:12 2013) [sssd[be[default]]] [ldb] (0x4000): start ldb 
> transaction (nesting: 0)
> (Thu Oct 31 13:48:12 2013) [sssd[be[default]]] [ldb] (0x4000): commit ldb 
> transaction (nesting: 0)
> (Thu Oct 31 13:48:12 2013) [sssd[be[default]]] [sdap_account_expired_ad] 
> (0x0400): Performing AD access check for user [cmp12]
> (Thu Oct 31 13:48:12 2013) [sssd[be[default]]] [sdap_account_expired_ad] 
> (0x4000): User account control for user [cmp12] is [200].
> (Thu Oct 31 13:48:12 2013) [sssd[be[default]]] [sdap_account_expired_ad] 
> (0x4000): Expiration time for user [cmp12] is [9223372036854775807].
> (Thu Oct 31 13:48:12 2013) [sssd[be[default]]] [be_pam_handler_callback] 
> (0x0100): Backend returned: (0, 0, <NULL>) [Success]

This log snippet doesn't tell us what's wrong, can you take a look if
you see something in the logs? Maybe the pam logs would have some hints
as well. I suspect SSSD attempts to create some temporary file (for
selinux perhaps? Not sure without logs) and fails on read-only FS.
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users

Reply via email to