On 01/11/13 10:00, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
Yes it is guaranteed to be there (or we can safely assume so) if we use
Ldap_id_mapping = False
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jakub Hrozek
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2013 10:52 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [SSSD-users] AD provider uses wrong user attribute?
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 09:36:05AM +0000, Ondrej Valousek wrote:
Hi List,
Looks like the AD provider in sssd honors sAMAccountname attribute instead of
the 'uid' (which is more in line with the RFC2307).
Is this intentional or a bug?
Thanks,
Ondrej
Intentional, is UID guaranteed to be there in all setups even if RFC2307
attributes are not present on the AD side?
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
I wouldn't like to bet on 'uid' being there on Samba4 AD if the user is
created with samba-tool, 'uid' is an optional attribute.
Rowland
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-users
