On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 02:29:33PM -0400, Cyril Scetbon wrote:
> Hey Jakub,
> 
> So I think I've provided you all the log files I could. The last version 
> (first a connection with the reachable ldap, and then without) can be found 
> at : http://pastebin.com/B3JnMr65
> 
> The other logs are empty :

Because you didn't enable debugging in those respective sections, only
in [domain]. We don't log anything except fatal failures by default..

> 
> # ls -lrt /var/log/sssd/
> total 304
> -rw------- 1 root root      0 Mar 17 19:16 sssd_pam.log
> -rw------- 1 root root      0 Mar 17 19:16 sssd_nss.log
> -rw------- 1 root root      0 Mar 17 19:16 sssd_autofs.log
> -rw------- 1 root root      0 Mar 17 19:16 sssd.log
> -rw------- 1 root root      0 Mar 17 19:16 ldap_child.log
> -rw------- 1 root root 306912 Mar 17 19:17 sssd_default.log
> 
> However I found other logs :
> 
> Mar 17 19:22:26 cscetbon-vdi mysqld: pam_sss(serverdb:auth): authentication 
> success; logname= uid=64259 euid=64259 tty= ruser= rhost= user=myuser  <==== 
> ldap accessible
> 
> Mar 17 19:22:49 cscetbon-vdi mysqld: pam_sss(serverdb:auth): authentication 
> success; logname= uid=64259 euid=64259 tty= ruser= rhost= user= myuser <== no 
> ldap
> Mar 17 19:22:54 cscetbon-vdi mysqld: nss_ldap: could not search LDAP server - 
> Server is unavailable
> Mar 17 19:22:55 cscetbon-vdi unix_chkpwd: nss_ldap: could not connect to any 
> LDAP server as uid=pamldap,ou=Auth,dc=fti,dc=net - Can't contact LDAP server
> Mar 17 19:22:55 cscetbon-vdi unix_chkpwd: nss_ldap: failed to bind to LDAP 
> server ldaps://ldap.multis/: Can't contact LDAP server
> Mar 17 19:22:55 cscetbon-vdi unix_chkpwd: nss_ldap: could not search LDAP 
> server - Server is unavailable
> Mar 17 19:22:55 cscetbon-vdi unix_chkpwd[3173]: could not obtain user info 
> (myuser)
> Mar 17 19:25:01 cscetbon-vdi CRON[3652]: pam_unix(cron:session): session 
> opened for user root by (uid=0)
> Mar 17 19:25:01 cscetbon-vdi CRON[3652]: pam_unix(cron:session): session 
> closed for user root
> 
> I'm wondering if another pam file is not included even if I thought it's not 
> because of this unix_chkpwd issue

Yes, I would have also expected pam_sss to show up here because the
domain log files you showed earlier included a PAM_* action, which must
have been triggered by something..
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/admin/lists/[email protected]

Reply via email to