On 9/21/18 7:53 PM, Beale (US), Gareth wrote: > Due to the large number of users and groups in our LDAP directory, and > the limitations of some legacy Unix systems, we have some large groups > that have been broken into “sub-groups” with the same GID but an > incremental suffix.
I'd consider this to be broken data. > I don’t believe this is an uncommon solution, Frankly I never saw this. Personally I'd consider this to be rather uncommon. > and it has worked fine for many years. Your systems really handled full group lookups by GID correctly? How? Ciao, Michael.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
