Alexey,

Yes -- same bug.

Here's what's cute.  It only occurs on specific child AD domains.  for
instance, APAC (asia pacific) can see only EMEA (Europe-Middle
East-Africa).  Cannot see AMER (Americas).   Consistently, all servers in
that child domain cannot discover (with this new sssd version).

In other AD domains (like AMER), consistently all servers with this new
sssd version do discover all AD domains.  So servers in AMER discover all
expected domains.

Spike



On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:11 PM Alexey Tikhonov <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 5:52 PM Spike White <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> sssd experts,
>>
>> This sssd version (released Tue 23 Nov 2021) is under-discovering AD
>> domains.
>>
>> A similar sssd bug occurred last July, where sssd over-discovered AD
>> domains (AD domains for which there was not a legal trust relationship with
>> this AD domain.)  Now, it appears that sssd is under-discovering AD domains
>> (not discovering AD domains which have a valid trust relationship with this
>> AD domain).
>>
>> Ultimately, an sssd developer on this sssd mailing list (Sumit Rose)
>> resolved the July bug of AD domain over-discovery.   Hopefully, someone
>> will recognize this new AD domain under-discovery bug.
>>
>> We have opened RedHat support case #03124778 for this new AD domain
>> under-discovery bug.  But to be frank, such complicated sssd bugs don’t get
>> resolved by RHEL L1 customer support.  (RHEL customer support is great, but
>> not for complicated sssd bugs.)
>>
>> For now, we have pulled sssd-*-1.16.5-10.0.1.el7_9.11.x86_64 RPMs out of
>> our Jan OS patching cycle.
>>
>
> Please check the description of
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2032867
> Does it match your issue?
>
> Btw, ".0.1." in "1.16.5-10.0.1.el7_9.11" looks weird. Package version
> should be 1.16.5-10.el7_9.10
>
>
>
>
>
>> Spike
>> _______________________________________________
>> sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
>> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
> Do not reply to spam on the list, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
>
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Reply via email to