Thanks for the suggestion James! That sounds similar to what our existing SAN vendor (Hitachi) does with their NAS devices. We avoided it as it had a very low maximum user limit (from memory only 1000 at a time) and it sounded unmanageable through automation anyway (no API etc).
It sounds like you've got something which is manageable, but what are the security implications? Thanks again, I'll look in to your utility now. I had heard rumour that the (now Dell) Isilon NAS devices (which are a clustered BSD based system) may support the algorithm, but I was (perhaps naively) hoping people here might be able to confirm and could know of more options. Why is Linux interoperability so hard in NASs in 2022 without using a deprecated AD schema extension?! Ed _______________________________________________ sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
