Am Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:10:26PM +0100 schrieb Francis Augusto 
Medeiros-Logeay:
> 
> 
...
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > would it be possible to send me debug logs with 'debug_level = 9' in the
> > [domain/...] and [pac] sections of sssd.conf where neither
> > ldap_user_principal nor 'krb5_validate = false' is set?
> 
> Thanks a lot, Sumit.
> Sending you the log below. But, truth be told, we don’t have a [pac] session 
> configured, so I created one just for the debug_level.
> 
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [dp_req_reply_std] (0x1000): [RID#6] 
> DP Request [Initgroups #6]: Returning [Success]: 0,0,Success
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [sbus_issue_request_done] (0x0400): 
> sssd.dataprovider.getAccountInfo: Success
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [sbus_dispatch] (0x4000): Dispatching.
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [sbus_dispatch] (0x4000): Dispatching.
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [sbus_dispatch] (0x4000): Dispatching.
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [sbus_method_handler] (0x2000): 
> Received D-Bus method sssd.dataprovider.pamHandler on /sssd
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [sbus_senders_lookup] (0x2000): 
> Looking for identity of sender [sssd.pam]
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [dp_pam_handler_send] (0x0100): Got 
> request with the following data
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): command: 
> SSS_PAM_AUTHENTICATE
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): domain: 
> DOMAIN.NO
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): user: 
> [email protected]
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): service: 
> sshd
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): tty: ssh
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): ruser: 
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): rhost: ::1
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): authtok 
> type: 1 (Password)
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): newauthtok 
> type: 0 (No authentication token available)
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): priv: 1
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): cli_pid: 
> 13919
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): child_pid: 0
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): logon name: 
> not set
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [pam_print_data] (0x0100): flags: 0
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [dp_attach_req] (0x0400): [RID#7] DP 
> Request [PAM Authenticate #7]: REQ_TRACE: New request. [sssd.pam CID #1] 
> Flags [0000].
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [dp_attach_req] (0x0400): [RID#7] 
> Number of active DP request: 1
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [sss_domain_get_state] (0x1000): 
> [RID#7] Domain DOMAIN.NO is Active
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [krb5_auth_queue_send] (0x1000): 
> [RID#7] Wait queue of user [[email protected]] is empty, running request 
> [0x5649c3a4b960] immediately.
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [krb5_setup] (0x4000): [RID#7] No 
> mapping for: [email protected]
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [krb5_auth_send] (0x0040): [RID#7] 
> compare_principal_realm failed.

Hi,

can you check which value is stored in the 'userPrincipalName' attribute
for the user '[email protected]' on the AD DC?

bye,
Sumit

> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [check_wait_queue] (0x1000): [RID#7] 
> Wait queue for user [[email protected]] is empty.
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [krb5_auth_queue_done] (0x0040): 
> [RID#7] krb5_auth_recv failed with: 22
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [dp_req_done] (0x0400): [RID#7] DP 
> Request [PAM Authenticate #7]: Request handler finished [0]: Success
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [dp_req_done] (0x20000): [RID#7] DP 
> Request [PAM Authenticate #7]: Handling request took [0.101] milliseconds.
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [_dp_req_recv] (0x0400): [RID#7] DP 
> Request [PAM Authenticate #7]: Receiving request data.
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [dp_req_destructor] (0x0400): [RID#7] 
> DP Request [PAM Authenticate #7]: Request removed.
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [dp_req_destructor] (0x0400): [RID#7] 
> Number of active DP request: 0
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [dp_method_enabled] (0x0400): [RID#7] 
> Target selinux is not configured
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [sbus_issue_request_done] (0x0400): 
> sssd.dataprovider.pamHandler: Success
> (2022-11-22 20:03:21): [be[DOMAIN.NO]] [sbus_dispatch] (0x4000): Dispatching.
> 
> 
> 
> > 
> >> 
> >> Is there an upcoming fix coming for this, by any chance?
> > 
> > Yes, please watch the bugzilla ticket.
> 
> Will do so. Thanks!
> 
> Francis
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to