Hi all,
I am working on a system which does TACACS+ authentication of users with 
pam_tacplus and nss_tacplus libraries 
nss_tacplus: https://github.com/benschumacher/nss_tacplus
pam_tacplus: https://github.com/kravietz/pam_tacplus

This solution relied on NSCD to be running, since the nss_tacplus only 
implemented getpwnam_r . For getpwuid_r etc it relied on the cached entries in 
nscd. It was working fine until fedora removed NSCD from glibc in FC36 
(https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveNSCD)

The above write up indicates that SSSD could be used to cover all cacheing 
requirements that was previously provided by NSCD. However I am unable to 
configure SSSD for my use case.

When I tried to link the id_provider as proxy and the proxy_lib_name as 
tacplus, sssd fails to come up. If fails with this error:


(2022-12-19 23:32:35): [be[shadowutils]] [sss_load_nss_symbols] (0x0010): 
Library 'libnss_tacplus.so.2' did not provide mandatory symbol 'getpwuid_r', 
error: /lib64/libnss_tacplus.so.2: undefined symbol: _nss_tacplus_getpwuid_r.

Is there any way to use sssd with the above mentioned nss_tacplus library? By 
this I mean can sssd be configured to do getpwnam only using the nss_tacplus, 
at which time it could cache the passwd details of the user, and use the cache 
for the other APIs like getpwuid etc?

_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to