On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 5:34 PM Prentice Bisbal <[email protected]> wrote:
> (difficult to confirm without coredump/backtraces).
>
> Would a stack trace of automount or the sssd daemon be sufficient?
>
No, I meant backtrace from a coredump. Maybe `ltrace` can help also, but I
doubt `strace` is handy here.
>
> I tried to compile the trivial reproducer from the GitHub Issue you linked
> to, but I'm getting an error when I try to compile it:
>
> # gcc sssd_tester.c -o sssd_tester -lsss_nss_idmap -lpthread -ldl
> sssd_tester.c: In function ‘thread’:
> sssd_tester.c:12:5: warning: implicit declaration of function
> ‘sss_getpwnam’; did you mean ‘getpwnam’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 12 | sss_getpwnam("test", &res, buff, sizeof(buff), &errnop);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> | getpwnam
>
> It looks like sss_getpwnam isn't defined in any of the header files in
> /usr/include, or I just can't find what package provides it.
>
Link against `/lib64/libnss_sss.so.2`:
```
$ nm -D /lib64/libnss_sss.so.2 | grep sss_getpwnam
0000000000005f10 T _nss_sss_getpwnam_r@@EXPORTED
```
(no need to link against `sss_nss_idmap`)
But why? It won't help to assure you face the same issue.
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
