On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 11:22 PM Spike White <[email protected]> wrote:

> Alexey,
>
> Yes I see that now.  That every time it starts a new LDAP connection, it
> starts by querying rootDSE.  So I have to look further in the logs.
>
> I think I have discerned a pattern.  It appears that on each hour and
> half-hour, it's querying the members of the simple_allow_groups line.
>

A cron job run under a corresponding user?

In the domain log, next line after "Got request for" there should be line
like
```
DP Request [Account #2]: REQ_TRACE: New request. [sssd.nss CID #1]
```
  --  this tells you what service ('sssd_nss' in this case) requested this
lookup and what is request ID in its logs ('#1' in this case).

Next you can grep sssd_nss.log to figure out who app triggered this:
```
(2023-04-14 14:02:08): [nss] [get_client_cred] (0x4000): Client
[0x55eb3ac27760][27] creds: euid[0] egid[0] pid[181089] cmd_line['id'].
(2023-04-14 14:02:08): [nss] [setup_client_idle_timer] (0x4000): Idle timer
re-set for client [0x55eb3ac27760][27]
(2023-04-14 14:02:08): [nss] [accept_fd_handler] (0x0400): [CID#1] Client
[cmd id][uid 0][0x55eb3ac27760][27] connected!
```
  --  'id' in this case.



>   I have examined this on 5 different servers in different
> geographical locations, it holds true for each server.
>
> for example, in /var/log/sssd dir:
>
> # grep -A 4 'sbus_dispatch.*Dispatching.' sssd_amer.corp.com.log | grep
> 'name=' | grep BE_REQ_GROUP
>
> Here's the output.  Each ellipsis is 10 - 20 lines omitted that occurs in
> the same second.
>
> (2023-10-03 10:07:50): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][[email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 10:07:50): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][[email protected]]
> ...
> (2023-10-03 10:30:02): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 10:30:03): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 10:30:03): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 10:30:03): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 10:30:03): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 10:30:03): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 10:30:03): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> ...
> (2023-10-03 10:30:03): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][[email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 10:30:03): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][[email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 10:30:03): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][[email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 11:00:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 11:00:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 11:00:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> ...
> (2023-10-03 11:30:02): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 11:30:02): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 11:30:06): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 11:30:06): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> ...
> (2023-10-03 12:00:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 12:00:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 12:00:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 12:00:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 12:00:06): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> ...
> (2023-10-03 12:30:02): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 12:30:02): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 12:30:04): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> ...
> (2023-10-03 12:41:16): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 12:41:16): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 12:41:16): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> ...
> (2023-10-03 12:49:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][[email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 12:49:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][[email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 12:49:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][[email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 12:49:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][[email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 12:49:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][[email protected]]
> ...
> (2023-10-03 13:00:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 13:00:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 13:00:01): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> ...
> (2023-10-03 13:26:18): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 13:26:18): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> ...
> (2023-10-03 13:30:02): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 13:30:02): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 13:30:02): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> (2023-10-03 13:30:02): [be[amer.corp.com]] [dp_get_account_info_send]
> (0x0200): Got request for [0x2][BE_REQ_GROUP][name=
> [email protected]]
> ...
> and it continues on, each and every half-hour.
>
> So it appears that something is waking up every half-hour and validating
> memberships in the simple_allow_groups.  I don't claim that's all that's
> being performed on this half-hour wake-up, but it is clear this is occuring.
>
> Different servers have different simple_allow_group memberships;  it's
> always the memberships for that specific server that's being queried.
>
> Spike
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 12:23 PM Alexey Tikhonov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 7:01 PM Spike White <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > So the idea to turn on debug_level = 9 on the client and view the logs
>> was inspired.  We turned on debug level 9 on 4 clients;
>> >
>> > 2 in the list (that we got from AD team of servers in that AMERAustin
>> site hitting the non-AMER Austin AD DCs).
>> > 2 not in their list.  (1 in another AMER site).
>> >
>> > Consistently, we see them querying the rootDSE for all these domains on
>> the hour and the half-hour.  Querying the local AMER rootDSE in Austin is
>> not a problem;  they have beaucoup AD DCs in Austin.  Querying the other
>> domains' rootDSEs in Austin is a problem;  they typically only have 2 AD
>> DCs from each region.
>> >
>> > Here’s an example from the client logs.  First client:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > (2023-10-03  0:30:06): [be[amer.corp.com]]
>> [sdap_ldap_connect_callback_add] (0x1000): New LDAP connection to [ldap://
>> ausdc16corp05.corp.com:389/??base] with fd [30].
>> >
>> > (2023-10-03  0:30:06): [be[amer.corp.com]] [sdap_get_rootdse_send]
>> (0x4000): Getting rootdse
>> >
>> > …
>> >
>> > (2023-10-03  0:41:18): [be[amer.corp.com]]
>> [sdap_ldap_connect_callback_add] (0x1000): New LDAP connection to [ldap://
>> AUSDC16ROAMER01.amer.corp.com:389/??base] with fd [20].
>> >
>> > (2023-10-03  0:41:18): [be[amer.corp.com]] [sdap_get_rootdse_send]
>> (0x4000): Getting rootdse
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Another client:
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > (2023-10-02 11:30:02): [be[amer.corp.com]]
>> [sdap_ldap_connect_callback_add] (0x4000): [RID#48] New connection to
>> [ldap://ausdc16amer33.amer.corp.com:3268/??base] with fd [25]
>> >
>> > (2023-10-02 11:30:02): [be[amer.corp.com]] [sdap_get_rootdse_send]
>> (0x4000): [RID#48] Getting rootdse
>> >
>>
>> What goes next for this 'RID#48', after 'rootdse' is read?
>>
>> SSSD doesn't query 'rootdse' on its own. It is being read (as a first
>> operation) when a new connection is established.
>> You need to see what happens next to figure out *why* this new
>> connection is established.
>>
>> As a practical side note, you can also increase
>> `ldap_connection_expire_timeout` to keep connections longer.
>> But I would figure out the reason first.
>>
>>
>> > --
>> >
>> > (2023-10-02 11:30:04): [be[amer.corp.com]]
>> [sdap_ldap_connect_callback_add] (0x4000): [RID#49] New connection to
>> [ldap://ausdc16emea05.emea.corp.com:389/??base] with fd [26]
>> >
>> > (2023-10-02 11:30:04): [be[amer.corp.com]] [sdap_get_rootdse_send]
>> (0x4000): [RID#49] Getting rootdse
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > (2023-10-02 11:30:05): [be[amer.corp.com]]
>> [sdap_ldap_connect_callback_add] (0x4000): [RID#50] New connection to
>> [ldap://ausdc16apac06.apac.corp.com:389/??base] with fd [27]
>> >
>> > (2023-10-02 11:30:05): [be[amer.corp.com]] [sdap_get_rootdse_send]
>> (0x4000): [RID#50] Getting rootdse
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > (2023-10-02 11:30:05): [be[amer.corp.com]]
>> [sdap_ldap_connect_callback_add] (0x4000): [RID#51] New connection to
>> [ldap://AUSDC16JAPN02.japn.corp.com:389/??base] with fd [28]
>> >
>> > (2023-10-02 11:30:05): [be[amer.corp.com]] [sdap_get_rootdse_send]
>> (0x4000): [RID#51] Getting rootdse
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> > (2023-10-02 11:32:52): [be[amer.corp.com]]
>> [sdap_ldap_connect_callback_add] (0x4000): [RID#84] New connection to
>> [ldap://ausdc16emea05.emea.corp.com:389/??base] with fd [26]
>> >
>> > (2023-10-02 11:32:52): [be[amer.corp.com]] [sdap_get_rootdse_send]
>> (0x4000): [RID#84] Getting rootdse
>> >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > BTW, this seems to occurs on both RHEL7 and RHEL8.  (Haven't looked at
>> our RHEL9 builds yet).   It's occurring on all servers to all rootDSEs, but
>> only a problem for AMERAustin, since Austin is such a heavily-populated.
>> >
>> >
>> > These rootDSEs change almost never.  Any way to have it query not as
>> frequently, or randomize when servers query these rootDSEs.
>> >
>> >
>> > Spike
>> >
>> > On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 2:37 AM Alexey Tikhonov <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 6:20 AM Spike White <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> All,
>> >>>
>> >>> Is there anything in sssd's RHEL and RHEL-like Linux server OS
>> settings that perform LDAP binds or connections to AD every 30 minutes?
>> >>>
>> >>> What our AD team is seeing is all of the DCs in our biggest AMER AD
>> site peak with LDAP sessions for about 10 minutes at the top of the hour
>> then again at the bottom of the hour.  No other AD site in the world
>> appears to see this behavior not even other AD sites in this metro area.
>> >>>
>> >>> The reason they noticed is that our non-amer DCs in this biggest AD
>> site hit their 5k LDAP client session limit during those 10 minutes every
>> 30 minutes.  Meaning any clients attempting to establish a LDAP session
>> past 5000 are dropped by the DC.  In their research they see thousands LDAP
>> Binds by RHEL Linux servers against two specific non-AMER AD DCs in a short
>> period of time after digging through some LDAP log samples that they pulled
>> from these DCs.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Can they also say what operations are being performed by those
>> connections?
>> >> Or can you check SSSD logs on the client side?
>> >>
>> >> I wonder if this could be `ldap_sudo_smart_refresh_interval`...
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> In this major AD sites, we have dozens and dozens of AMER AD DCs.  So
>> there's enough preferred AD DCs to spread the load.  But typically for the
>> non-AMER regions, the AD team puts 2 of each regions DCs in a site.  For
>> instance, for APAC they would be put two APAC DCs in this AMER major site.
>> Thus all AMER RHEL servers in this site would randomly hit dozens of AMER
>> DCs, but concentrate on these two preferred APAC DCs.  (preferred because
>> they're in this locatiion).
>> >>>
>> >>> I know our older AD integration product used to hit AD every 30 mins
>> to check GPOs, but we're not implementing GPOs with sssd.
>> >>>
>> >>> Spike
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected]
>> >>> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> [email protected]
>> >>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> >>> List Guidelines:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> >>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
>> >>> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected]
>> >> To unsubscribe send an email to
>> [email protected]
>> >> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> >> List Guidelines:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> >> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
>> >> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected]
>> > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
>> > Do not reply to spam, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>> _______________________________________________
>> sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected]
>> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
>> Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
>> Do not reply to spam, report it:
>> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>>
> _______________________________________________
> sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
_______________________________________________
sssd-users mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to