i would like to report it but I wanted to gather opinions on the matter of FreeBSD-set-src being marked as vital first -------- Original Message -------- On Friday, 10/17/25 at 06:40 Graham Perrin <[email protected]> wrote:
> (Reduced to the maximum of two lists) > > On 16/10/2025 19:20, [email protected] wrote: > >> … the "1 missing" really confused me, if it wasn't for a helpful guy from >> the community i wouldn't have figured out that the issue was that >> "FreeBSD-set-src" is marked as vital, so i think it would really helpful if >> it is possible that pkg can tell that instead of saying "1 missing" > > +1 > > [<https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg/2025-September/001550.html>](https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg/2025-September/001550.html), > > [<https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg/2025-September/001553.html>](https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-pkg/2025-September/001553.html) > >> Understanding vital with version 2.2.2 of pkg in FreeBSD 16.0-CURRENT >> (1600000) > > polyduekes, I should recommend adding the issue to GitHub, if it's not > already there (I don't see it). > > [<https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues?q=is:issue%20is:open%20sort:updated-desc>](https://github.com/freebsd/pkg/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc)
