On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Minchan Kim <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 2:28 AM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 03, 2010 at 04:07:19PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote: >>> With that in mind, it is our intention to also maintain a 2.6.34 >>> longterm tree. Jason and I work at Wind River, which already has >>> released products based on v2.6.34, and as such it only makes sense >>> to have a public long-term tree that others who are also based on >>> 2.6.34 can make use of. >> >> Other than Wind River, what other distros/userbases are using .34 as a >> platform for their products? > > I am not sure companies/platforms(Sony, Google, Meego, and Linaro) > mentioned below article really made a promise to produce product. > Article said, they decided 2.6.35 with flag version. > If it were real, I think flag version impact would be big on embedded > system(To be honest, alone android is enough big) > Cced Tim. > > http://lwn.net/Articles/413341/ > > Thanks for you effort, Good Luck, Paul. :)
Oops, I realized Andi maintains 2.6.35-longterm. It's good to hear. Sorry for the noise. Thanks. > -- > Kind regards, > Minchan Kim > -- Kind regards, Minchan Kim _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
