On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 12:17 AM, Greg KH <[email protected]> wrote: > > > It's the commit-message from the autogenerated patch, not the one I've > > sent you. Anisse Astier has done the not totally trivial backport (due to > > the complete rewrite of the gtt code in .37) and all the testing for it > > which is why I've put him as the author when making the commit message > > stable compliant. With your seemingly autogenerated message back, that > > acknowledgement is gone (also, Chris Wilson hasn't put his s-o-b line on > > this patch). > > Ah, I kept the original author as I didn't realize this, and didn't want > to not credit you properly. > > As the patch is the correct thing here, I'll leave it as-is if you don't > mind.
I really don't mind as long as my sign-off or tested-by are here (and they are). About the authorship, as I told Daniel, he should keep it his: he wrote the patch, I made it to compile and tested it. I still have very little understanding of the code, and my initial attempt to port the patch was a failure since the 2.6.37 codebase is very different from 2.6.35/36. So I'm ok with how it is. thanks, Anisse _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
