On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 13:02 -0800, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 12:44 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Dec 2010 12:26:30 -0800
> > Suresh Siddha <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 09:27 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > Can we make these registers and bits a bit more self-documenting (i.e.
> > > > #defines for both, maybe along with other useful bit definitions for
> > > > this reg)? Also, "error" is misspelled as "erorr" above. :)
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the review. Appended the updated patch. I haven't used
> > > #defines for the pci-id's, as the first one (IOH) is used by several
> > > chipsets and the second one is not named yet.
> > 
> > Is there a bug # that should be referenced in the commit log?  Any
> > tested-bys to add?
> 
> There is no kernel.org bug# but there are multiple bugs with different
> OSV's. And hence didn't care to mention to the bug #
> 
> Please add:
> 
> Reported-by: Max Asbock <[email protected]>
> Reported-and-tested-by: Takao Indoh <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Kenji Kaneshige <[email protected]>
> 

I tested the patches on a system with a Tylersburg chipset. I used the
patches against the 2.6.37-rc4 kernel and tested kdump. I still see the
Vt-d errors but they no longer cause NMIs. It works as expected. 

- Max

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to