Hello,

The below patch should be applied to the 2.6.27-stable tree to fix the
regression introduced by commit
4e9e4fcb0d12ae07cd6e9a9430927eb1dbfb0166. Thanks.

Greg KH wrote :
> 2.6.32-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> ----------------
> From: Shan Wei <[email protected]>
> 
> [ Upstream commit c92b544bd5d8e7ed7d81c77bbecab6df2a95aa53 ]
> 
> The commit 0b5ccb2(title:ipv6: reassembly: use seperate reassembly queues for
> conntrack and local delivery) has broken the saddr&&daddr member of
> nf_ct_frag6_queue when creating new queue.  And then hash value
> generated by nf_hashfn() was not equal with that generated by fq_find().
> So, a new received fragment can't be inserted to right queue.
> 
> The patch fixes the bug with adding member of user to nf_ct_frag6_queue 
> structure.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shan Wei <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Patrick McHardy <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
>  net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> --- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_conntrack_reasm.c
> @@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ struct nf_ct_frag6_queue
>       struct inet_frag_queue  q;
>  
>       __be32                  id;             /* fragment id          */
> +     u32                     user;
>       struct in6_addr         saddr;
>       struct in6_addr         daddr;
>  
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to