On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 10:03:42PM -0500, Lee Schermerhorn wrote: > On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 16:04 -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > 2.6.27-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us > > know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> > > > > commit 800416f799e0723635ac2d720ad4449917a1481c upstream. > > > > When a node contains only HighMem memory, slab_node(MPOL_BIND) > > dereferences a NULL pointer. > > > > [ This code seems to go back all the way to commit 19770b32609b: "mm: > > filter based on a nodemask as well as a gfp_mask". Which was back in > > April 2008, and it got merged into 2.6.26. - Linus ] > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> > > Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> > > Cc: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> > > Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <[email protected]> > > Cc: Andrew Morton <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> > > > > --- > > mm/mempolicy.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c > > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c > > @@ -1404,7 +1404,7 @@ unsigned slab_node(struct mempolicy *pol > > (void)first_zones_zonelist(zonelist, highest_zoneidx, > > &policy->v.nodes, > > &zone); > > - return zone->node; > > + return zone ? zone->node : numa_node_id(); > > I think this should be numa_mem_id(). Given the documented purpose of > slab_node(), we want a node from which page allocation is likely to > succeed. numa_node_id() can return a memoryless node for, e.g., some > configurations of some HP ia64 platforms. numa_mem_id() was introduced > to return that same node from which "local" mempolicy would allocate > pages.
So should the upstream patch be changed? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
