At Wed, 08 Dec 2010 10:55:30 +0100,
David Henningsson wrote:
> 
> On 2010-12-07 09:28, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > At Mon, 6 Dec 2010 11:48:27 -0800,
> > Greg KH wrote:
> >>
> >> This breaks the build on the .36 kernel tree, so I'm not including it
> >> there.  If you want it included in that stable tree, please provide me
> >> with a working backport.
> >
> > Looks like a fuzz while applying to 2.6.36.
> >
> > David, care to refresh the patch and submit again?
> > (don't forget to add the upstream commit id with the update patch)
> 
> Sorry, I gave it a try, but unfortunately I'll have to give up on this 
> one due to lack of time/priority. It seems like at least the two commits 
> below are needed to make the patch work, but I'm not sure it's enough. 
> Maybe we end up with a too large dependency chain to qualify it for a 
> stable update anyway.

Ah, so this is actually no regression fix, as the new chips weren't
supported by 2.6.36 anyway :)

I think we can drop it from stable.


thanks,

Takashi

> 
> commit 8a345a042ae75097fd493633633382644257cfc3
> Author: Charles Chin <[email protected]>
> Date:   Tue Aug 10 11:43:25 2010 +0200
> 
>      ALSA: hda - Adding support for new IDT 92HD87XX codecs
> 
>      Added the entries for 92HD87B1/3 and 92HD87B2/4 codecs.
>      These are compatible with existing 83xxx codecs.
> 
>      Signed-off-by: Charles Chin <[email protected]>
>      Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> commit ab5a6ebee38f3ed311f0565ecd3fba5cf111564a
> Author: Vitaliy Kulikov <[email protected]>
> Date:   Wed Sep 8 09:00:17 2010 +0200
> 
>      ALSA: hda - Adding support for new IDT 92HD90BXX and 92HD91BXX codecs
> 
>      Adding support for digital MIC in 92HD83/90/91XXX codecs family.
> 
>      Signed-off-by: Vitaliy Kulikov <[email protected]>
>      Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Henningsson, Canonical Ltd.
> http://launchpad.net/~diwic
> 

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to