On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 00:19 +0100, Peter Huewe wrote: > This patch fixes a build failure[1] for the avr32 architecture which seems > to be introduced by commit d7627467b7a8 > "Make do_execve() take a const filename pointer" > > The commit changes the definition in arch/avr32/kernel/process.c but > forgot to change it here. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <[email protected]>
Thanks for the heads-up. > --- > This build failure exists in linus' tree - added [email protected] to the cc > list > > KernelVersion: linux-next-20101208 > References: > [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3607003/ > > arch/avr32/include/asm/syscalls.h | 6 ++++-- > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/avr32/include/asm/syscalls.h > b/arch/avr32/include/asm/syscalls.h > index ab608b7..1440368 100644 > --- a/arch/avr32/include/asm/syscalls.h > +++ b/arch/avr32/include/asm/syscalls.h > @@ -21,8 +21,10 @@ asmlinkage int sys_clone(unsigned long, unsigned long, > unsigned long, unsigned long, > struct pt_regs *); > asmlinkage int sys_vfork(struct pt_regs *); > -asmlinkage int sys_execve(const char __user *, char __user *__user *, > - char __user *__user *, struct pt_regs *); > +asmlinkage int sys_execve(const char __user *ufilename, > + const char __user *const __user *uargv, > + const char __user *const __user *uenvp, > + struct pt_regs *regs); Actually, I think it would be just as good to move to using the syscalls.h in asm-generic. Let me prepare a patch or two for that. I can try to push it through my, now hopefully working, arch tree. -- Hans-Christian Egtvedt _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
