2.6.35-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------ From: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]> commit e7480bbb926c5816e4fbfca70748096bbe0e4978 upstream. Be consistent and use the wk->chan instead of the local->hw.conf.channel for the association done work. This prevents any possible races against channel changes while we run this work. In the case that the race did happen we would be initializing the bit rates for the new AP under the assumption of a wrong channel and in the worst case, wrong band. This could lead to trying to assuming we could use CCK frames on 5 GHz, for example. This patch has a fix for kernels >= v2.6.34 Signed-off-by: Luis R. Rodriguez <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]> --- net/mac80211/mlme.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Index: linux/net/mac80211/mlme.c =================================================================== --- linux.orig/net/mac80211/mlme.c +++ linux/net/mac80211/mlme.c @@ -1210,7 +1210,7 @@ static bool ieee80211_assoc_success(stru rates = 0; basic_rates = 0; - sband = local->hw.wiphy->bands[local->hw.conf.channel->band]; + sband = local->hw.wiphy->bands[wk->chan->band]; for (i = 0; i < elems.supp_rates_len; i++) { int rate = (elems.supp_rates[i] & 0x7f) * 5; @@ -1246,11 +1246,11 @@ static bool ieee80211_assoc_success(stru } } - sta->sta.supp_rates[local->hw.conf.channel->band] = rates; + sta->sta.supp_rates[wk->chan->band] = rates; sdata->vif.bss_conf.basic_rates = basic_rates; /* cf. IEEE 802.11 9.2.12 */ - if (local->hw.conf.channel->band == IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ && + if (wk->chan->band == IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ && have_higher_than_11mbit) sdata->flags |= IEEE80211_SDATA_OPERATING_GMODE; else _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
