On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 08:39:35AM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 11:36:10AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 04:21:46PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > > > Could you please update this tree: > > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.35.y.git > > > > ? > > > > > > No, the "stable" trees are not being updated anymore, they have moved to > > > the longterm git directory instead. > > > > It would be good if the old stable git tree for 2.6.35 was deleted to avoid > > confusion. Greg, what do you think? > > No, we have never deleted any of the other trees when we "stopped" > maintaining them, so we shouldn't delete these either. > > I need to look this week at using git notes to mark trees as unsupported > or supported in a way that will work well. That should solve this issue > as the note could also say 'go look at the longterm kernel' as well.
Once again, I think it's not too late to replace the old trees with a symlink to the new one (or the opposite), considering that users have not updated their scripts yet. Also I'm realizing it's a bit bothering as a user to have to change the address of the remote when tracking such a branch. Regards, Willy _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
