2.6.36-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let us know.

------------------

From: Sergey Vlasov <v...@altlinux.ru>

commit 21ac19d484a8ffb66f64487846c8d53afef04d2b upstream.

The commit 129a84de2347002f09721cda3155ccfd19fade40 (locks: fix F_GETLK
regression (failure to find conflicts)) fixed the posix_test_lock()
function by itself, however, its usage in NFS changed by the commit
9d6a8c5c213e34c475e72b245a8eb709258e968c (locks: give posix_test_lock
same interface as ->lock) remained broken - subsequent NFS-specific
locking code received F_UNLCK instead of the user-specified lock type.
To fix the problem, fl->fl_type needs to be saved before the
posix_test_lock() call and restored if no local conflicts were reported.

Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=23892
Tested-by: Alexander Morozov <amoro...@etersoft.ru>
Signed-off-by: Sergey Vlasov <v...@altlinux.ru>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.mykleb...@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@suse.de>

---
 fs/nfs/file.c |    2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/nfs/file.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/file.c
@@ -687,6 +687,7 @@ static int do_getlk(struct file *filp, i
 {
        struct inode *inode = filp->f_mapping->host;
        int status = 0;
+       unsigned int saved_type = fl->fl_type;
 
        /* Try local locking first */
        posix_test_lock(filp, fl);
@@ -694,6 +695,7 @@ static int do_getlk(struct file *filp, i
                /* found a conflict */
                goto out;
        }
+       fl->fl_type = saved_type;
 
        if (nfs_have_delegation(inode, FMODE_READ))
                goto out_noconflict;


_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
stable@linux.kernel.org
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to