On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 13:54 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-01-12 at 14:51 +0200, [email protected] wrote:
> > From: Luciano Coelho <[email protected]>
> > 
> > When the buffer size is set to zero in the block ack parameter set
> > field, we should use the maximum supported number of subframes.  The
> > existing code was bogus and was doing some unnecessary calculations
> > that lead to wrong values.
> > 
> > Thanks Johannes for helping me figure this one out.
> > 
> > Cc: [email protected]
> > Cc: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Johannes Berg <[email protected]>
> 
> It'd be easier for stable if you reordered with the other patch, I
> think, but I guess it's easy enough to fix up.

Will do.


> Also some older stable versions might have this code in a different
> file, but I'm not sure how to handle that.

Dunno how to handle that either... If I need to do something, someone
please just let me know. ;)

-- 
Cheers,
Luca.

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to