On 01/13/2011 05:22 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
The vmexit path on SVM needs to restore the KERNEL_GS_BASE
MSR in order to savely execute the NMI handler. Otherwise a
pending NMI can occur after the STGI instruction and crash
the machine.
This makes it impossible to run perf and kvm in parallel on
an AMD machine in a stable way.

Cc: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel<[email protected]>
---
  arch/x86/kvm/svm.c |    1 +
  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
index 25bd1bc..8b9bc72 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm.c
@@ -3637,6 +3637,7 @@ static void svm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)

  #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
        wrmsrl(MSR_GS_BASE, svm->host.gs_base);
+       wrmsrl(MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE, current->thread.gs);
  #else
        loadsegment(fs, svm->host.fs);
  #endif

Why would an NMI crash if MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE is bad?

I see save_paranoid depends on MSR_GS_BASE (specifically its sign, which is bad for the new instructions that allow userspace to write gsbase), but not on MSR_KERNEL_GS_BASE.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to