commit: 04d94879c8a4973b5499dc26b9d38acee8928791
From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 10:15:15 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] slub: Avoid use of slub_lock in show_slab_objects()

The purpose of the locking is to prevent removal and additions
of nodes when statistics are gathered for a slab cache. So we
need to avoid racing with memory hotplug functionality.

It is enough to take the memory hotplug locks there instead
of the slub_lock.

online_pages() currently does not acquire the memory_hotplug
lock. Another patch will be submitted by the memory hotplug
authors to take the memory hotplug lock and describe the
uses of the memory hotplug lock to protect against
adding and removal of nodes from non hotplug data structures.

Cc: <[email protected]> # 2.6.37
Reported-and-tested-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]>
Acked-by: David Rientjes <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>
---
 mm/slub.c |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
index bec0e35..96e6907 100644
--- a/mm/slub.c
+++ b/mm/slub.c
@@ -3821,7 +3821,7 @@ static ssize_t show_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s,
                }
        }
 
-       down_read(&slub_lock);
+       lock_memory_hotplug();
 #ifdef CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG
        if (flags & SO_ALL) {
                for_each_node_state(node, N_NORMAL_MEMORY) {
@@ -3862,7 +3862,7 @@ static ssize_t show_slab_objects(struct kmem_cache *s,
                        x += sprintf(buf + x, " N%d=%lu",
                                        node, nodes[node]);
 #endif
-       up_read(&slub_lock);
+       unlock_memory_hotplug();
        kfree(nodes);
        return x + sprintf(buf + x, "\n");
 }

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to