On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 11:38:17AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Jiri Bohac <[email protected]> wrote: > > I have the feeling that Eric's patch is the safest solution we > > have so far: > Eric's patch has other regressions, see the discussion.
What regression do you mean? I have read the whole discussion thoroughly. You only say in one message that deleting ::1 would propagate to routing daemons. And Eric correctly stated that people couldn't hit this, because deleting ::1 would break things on its own. Is there a real problem with Eric's fix? Thanks, -- Jiri Bohac <[email protected]> SUSE Labs, SUSE CZ _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
