On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 10:51:33AM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 09:12:46AM -0500, Dan Rosenberg wrote:
> > Commit bf5fc093c5b625e4259203f1cee7ca73488a5620 refactored
> > btrfs_ioctl_space_info() and introduced several security issues.
> > 
> > space_args.space_slots is an unsigned 64-bit type controlled by a
> > possibly unprivileged caller.  The comparison as a signed int type
> > allows providing values that are treated as negative and cause the
> > subsequent allocation size calculation to wrap, or be truncated to 0.
> > By providing a size that's truncated to 0, kmalloc() will return
> > ZERO_SIZE_PTR.  It's also possible to provide a value smaller than the
> > slot count.  The subsequent loop ignores the allocation size when
> > copying data in, resulting in a heap overflow or write to ZERO_SIZE_PTR.
> > 
> > The fix changes the slot count type and comparison typecast to u64,
> > which prevents truncation or signedness errors, and also ensures that we
> > don't copy more data than we've allocated in the subsequent loop.  Note
> > that zero-size allocations are no longer possible since there is already
> > an explicit check for space_args.space_slots being 0 and truncation of
> > this value is no longer an issue.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Rosenberg <[email protected]>
> 
> Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>
> 

Argh sorry I take it back, this is wrong, we can have multiple raid types per
space info, so you need to put the slot_count-- in the inner loop farther down
to count the actual slots we're adding.  Thanks,

Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <[email protected]>

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
index b72520b..89bfd41 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
@@ -2203,7 +2203,7 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_space_info(struct btrfs_root *root, void 
__user *arg)
        int num_types = 4;
        int alloc_size;
        int ret = 0;
-       int slot_count = 0;
+       u64 slot_count = 0;
        int i, c;
 
        if (copy_from_user(&space_args,
@@ -2242,7 +2242,7 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_space_info(struct btrfs_root *root, void 
__user *arg)
                goto out;
        }
 
-       slot_count = min_t(int, space_args.space_slots, slot_count);
+       slot_count = min_t(u64, space_args.space_slots, slot_count);
 
        alloc_size = sizeof(*dest) * slot_count;
 
@@ -2262,6 +2262,9 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_space_info(struct btrfs_root *root, void 
__user *arg)
        for (i = 0; i < num_types; i++) {
                struct btrfs_space_info *tmp;
 
+               if (!slot_count)
+                       break;
+
                info = NULL;
                rcu_read_lock();
                list_for_each_entry_rcu(tmp, &root->fs_info->space_info,
@@ -2283,7 +2286,10 @@ long btrfs_ioctl_space_info(struct btrfs_root *root, 
void __user *arg)
                                memcpy(dest, &space, sizeof(space));
                                dest++;
                                space_args.total_spaces++;
+                               slot_count--;
                        }
+                       if (!slot_count)
+                               break;
                }
                up_read(&info->groups_sem);
        }

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to