On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 02:41:05PM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 01/14/2011 02:16 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:58:17PM -0600, Tim Gardner wrote:
> >>Please consider including f8313ef1f448006207f12c107123522c8bc00f15 for
> >>2.6.36 stable (a clean cherry-pick). Attached is a backported patch for
> >>2.6.32-2.6.35.
> >
> >The git id in the patch doesn't seem to be valid for Linus' tree,
> >but from some other repository?
> >
> >The stable patches should also have a upstream git header.
> >
> >-Andi
> >
> 
> As far as I can tell, f8313ef1f448006207f12c107123522c8bc00f15 _is_
> a valid commit SHA1:
> 
> rtg:~/linux-2.6: git describe f8313ef1f448006207f12c107123522c8bc00f15
> v2.6.37-rc1-73-gf8313ef

That doesn't show what tree it ended up in.  This is also needed for
.37, you should do this instead:
        $ git describe --contains f8313ef1f448006207f12c107123522c8bc00f15
        v2.6.38-rc3~12^2~16^2~5

which shows that it was made public in 2.6.38-rc3, not 2.6.37-rc1.  Be
careful about this, it makes a big difference.

thanks,

greg k-h

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to