This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    sched, cgroup: Fixup broken cgroup movement

to the 2.6.32-longterm tree which can be found at:
    
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/longterm/longterm-queue-2.6.32.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     0023-sched-cgroup-Fixup-broken-cgroup-movement.patch
and it can be found in the queue-2.6.32 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the 2.6.32 longterm 
tree,
please let <[email protected]> know about it.


>From a77dfb9d34d1679ea857b18c980dc03399b4b90e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 10:23:28 +0100
Subject: sched, cgroup: Fixup broken cgroup movement

Commit: b2b5ce022acf5e9f52f7b78c5579994fdde191d4 upstream

Dima noticed that we fail to correct the ->vruntime of sleeping tasks
when we move them between cgroups.

Reported-by: Dima Zavin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
LKML-Reference: <1287150604.29097.1513.camel@twins>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/sched.h |    2 +-
 kernel/sched.c        |    8 ++++----
 kernel/sched_fair.c   |   25 +++++++++++++++++++------
 3 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1113,7 +1113,7 @@ struct sched_class {
                                         struct task_struct *task);
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-       void (*moved_group) (struct task_struct *p, int on_rq);
+       void (*task_move_group) (struct task_struct *p, int on_rq);
 #endif
 };
 
--- a/kernel/sched.c
+++ b/kernel/sched.c
@@ -10224,12 +10224,12 @@ void sched_move_task(struct task_struct
        if (unlikely(running))
                tsk->sched_class->put_prev_task(rq, tsk);
 
-       set_task_rq(tsk, task_cpu(tsk));
-
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-       if (tsk->sched_class->moved_group)
-               tsk->sched_class->moved_group(tsk, on_rq);
+       if (tsk->sched_class->task_move_group)
+               tsk->sched_class->task_move_group(tsk, on_rq);
+       else
 #endif
+               set_task_rq(tsk, task_cpu(tsk));
 
        if (unlikely(running))
                tsk->sched_class->set_curr_task(rq);
--- a/kernel/sched_fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched_fair.c
@@ -2068,13 +2068,26 @@ static void set_curr_task_fair(struct rq
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-static void moved_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq)
+static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq)
 {
-       struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(p);
-
-       update_curr(cfs_rq);
+       /*
+        * If the task was not on the rq at the time of this cgroup movement
+        * it must have been asleep, sleeping tasks keep their ->vruntime
+        * absolute on their old rq until wakeup (needed for the fair sleeper
+        * bonus in place_entity()).
+        *
+        * If it was on the rq, we've just 'preempted' it, which does convert
+        * ->vruntime to a relative base.
+        *
+        * Make sure both cases convert their relative position when migrating
+        * to another cgroup's rq. This does somewhat interfere with the
+        * fair sleeper stuff for the first placement, but who cares.
+        */
+       if (!on_rq)
+               p->se.vruntime -= cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->min_vruntime;
+       set_task_rq(p, task_cpu(p));
        if (!on_rq)
-               place_entity(cfs_rq, &p->se, 1);
+               p->se.vruntime += cfs_rq_of(&p->se)->min_vruntime;
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -2128,7 +2141,7 @@ static const struct sched_class fair_sch
        .get_rr_interval        = get_rr_interval_fair,
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-       .moved_group            = moved_group_fair,
+       .task_move_group        = task_move_group_fair,
 #endif
 };
 


Patches currently in longterm-queue-2.6.32 which might be from 
[email protected] are

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to