On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 03:01 +0100, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > I don't mind this patch being added to the long term tree. But I'm > > curious about what is the criteria for adding changes to it? This is a > > performance improvement and not a critical bug fix. > > Yes, I added it for the performance. .32-stable is enterprise beans and > biscuits. Same reason I added the load balancing fixes, boxen won't > explode without them, but load balancing performs better with them.
Thanks for clarifying. -- Steve _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
