On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 02:10:47PM +0100, Roland Vossen wrote: > Hi Greg, > > >>So, what should I do here? Drop the referenced patch from the > >>.37-stable queue, or do you have the text for the changelog that I > >>should use here instead? > >> > >>confused, > >> > > > >Dito here. I submitted a patch for the stable kernel and Roland did one > >(if I am correct). I have no clue how his commit message came with my > >patch or vice versa. > > > > Let me try to clear up part of the confusion. > > The short story is: for some mysterious reason, a patch exists that > is a mixup of two patches (one from Arend and one from me). It > contains the commit message from me, but the file changes from > Arend. This 'hybrid' patch was submitted for review by you. This > patch did not make it yet into the 2.6.37-stable tree. > > Also, neither Arends nor my Patch ended up in the 2.6.37-stable tree. > > To fix this problem, I think that this hybrid patch has to be review > rejected. Next, new patches have to be created based on Rolands > patch (6a3be6e6e7feb4cb35275475d6a863b748d59cc3, as submitted into > gregkh/staging-2.6.git::staging-linus branch) as well as Arends > patch (d062d44a8386c82c06e483f0c0d1124ba3cab2c8). These patches > would then have to be reviewed for the 2.6.37-stable tree.
Ok, I'm going to drop this patch now. Can someone create the needed patches for the .37-stable tree that should be included and send them to me and cc: [email protected] so I can queue them up for the next .37-stable release after this? thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
