On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 01:17:19AM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > Hi, > > I should have split out this segfault fix. > > On Tuesday 22 February 2011 23:16:54 Greg KH wrote: > > 2.6.37-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let > > us know. > > > > ------------------ > > > > From: Thomas Renninger <[email protected]> > > > > commit 20c457b8587bee4644d998331d9e13be82e05b4c upstream. > > > > [This patch is part of mainline git commit 20c457b8587bee4644d9. > > This should fix: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-perf- > > [email protected]/msg00057.html > > > > The regression was introduced by git commit: > > 4c21adf26f8fcf86a755b9b9f55c2e9fd241e1fb] > Above link is a nice pointer. > the rest of the changelog (below) does not fit and describes > the mainline patch, the tiny fix was part of. > > Don't know whether it's worth to touch it, but if, the changelog (or > title) of the patch should be as short as: > perf: timechart (userspace): Do not segfault on power_end events
I'll leave it as-is as I like to keep the commit messages as close as possible. thanks, greg k-h _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
