2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------ From: Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]> commit 12fed00de963433128b5366a21a55808fab2f756 upstream. When we get oplock break notification we should set the appropriate value of OplockLevel field in oplock break acknowledge according to the oplock level held by the client in this time. As we only can have level II oplock or no oplock in the case of oplock break, we should be aware only about clientCanCacheRead field in cifsInodeInfo structure. Also fix bug connected with wrong interpretation of OplockLevel field during oplock break notification processing. Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Steve French <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]> --- fs/cifs/cifsproto.h | 2 +- fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 4 +++- fs/cifs/file.c | 17 +++++++++-------- 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) --- a/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h +++ b/fs/cifs/cifsproto.h @@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ extern int CIFSSMBLock(const int xid, st const __u16 netfid, const __u64 len, const __u64 offset, const __u32 numUnlock, const __u32 numLock, const __u8 lockType, - const bool waitFlag); + const bool waitFlag, const __u8 oplock_level); extern int CIFSSMBPosixLock(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, const __u16 smb_file_id, const int get_flag, const __u64 len, struct file_lock *, --- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c +++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c @@ -1641,7 +1641,8 @@ int CIFSSMBLock(const int xid, struct cifsTconInfo *tcon, const __u16 smb_file_id, const __u64 len, const __u64 offset, const __u32 numUnlock, - const __u32 numLock, const __u8 lockType, const bool waitFlag) + const __u32 numLock, const __u8 lockType, + const bool waitFlag, const __u8 oplock_level) { int rc = 0; LOCK_REQ *pSMB = NULL; @@ -1669,6 +1670,7 @@ CIFSSMBLock(const int xid, struct cifsTc pSMB->NumberOfLocks = cpu_to_le16(numLock); pSMB->NumberOfUnlocks = cpu_to_le16(numUnlock); pSMB->LockType = lockType; + pSMB->OplockLevel = oplock_level; pSMB->AndXCommand = 0xFF; /* none */ pSMB->Fid = smb_file_id; /* netfid stays le */ --- a/fs/cifs/file.c +++ b/fs/cifs/file.c @@ -825,12 +825,12 @@ int cifs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd /* BB we could chain these into one lock request BB */ rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid, length, pfLock->fl_start, - 0, 1, lockType, 0 /* wait flag */ ); + 0, 1, lockType, 0 /* wait flag */, 0); if (rc == 0) { rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid, length, pfLock->fl_start, 1 /* numUnlock */ , 0 /* numLock */ , lockType, - 0 /* wait flag */ ); + 0 /* wait flag */, 0); pfLock->fl_type = F_UNLCK; if (rc != 0) cERROR(1, ("Error unlocking previously locked " @@ -873,8 +873,8 @@ int cifs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd if (numLock) { rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, netfid, length, - pfLock->fl_start, - 0, numLock, lockType, wait_flag); + pfLock->fl_start, 0, numLock, lockType, + wait_flag, 0); if (rc == 0) { /* For Windows locks we must store them. */ @@ -894,9 +894,9 @@ int cifs_lock(struct file *file, int cmd (pfLock->fl_start + length) >= (li->offset + li->length)) { stored_rc = CIFSSMBLock(xid, tcon, - netfid, - li->length, li->offset, - 1, 0, li->type, false); + netfid, li->length, + li->offset, 1, 0, + li->type, false, 0); if (stored_rc) rc = stored_rc; @@ -2314,7 +2314,8 @@ cifs_oplock_break(struct slow_work *work */ if (!cfile->closePend && !cfile->oplock_break_cancelled) { rc = CIFSSMBLock(0, cifs_sb->tcon, cfile->netfid, 0, 0, 0, 0, - LOCKING_ANDX_OPLOCK_RELEASE, false); + LOCKING_ANDX_OPLOCK_RELEASE, false, + cinode->clientCanCacheRead ? 1 : 0); cFYI(1, ("Oplock release rc = %d", rc)); } } _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
