On 20:44 Thu 10 Mar , Marc Kleine-Budde wrote: > On 03/10/2011 08:35 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > [...] > > There's some more discussion here: > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=357121 > > They have identified the 55ea499d60aefa3d03a77fc8590c26b5881faa92 as the > offending commit, too. Used system is x86_64. >
FWIW, that 'they' is me too; I reported it there first, but decided to bring the discussion to the kernel lists when things didn't seem to be progressing at the distro level. > > Greg, Trond, as this is a regression in -stable, I wonder if it's best > > that we just revert the commit? > > No - that would break arm < armv6 and IIRC parisc. > > Marc > -- > Pengutronix e.K. | Marc Kleine-Budde | > Industrial Linux Solutions | Phone: +49-231-2826-924 | > Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | > Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | http://www.pengutronix.de | > -- Andrew :) Free Java Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. (http://www.redhat.com) _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
