On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 03:28:42PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> 
> The patch below does not apply to the .38-stable tree.
> If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
> tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
> id to <[email protected]>.

Oops, I applied things out of order, I now got the patch below to apply,
sorry for the noise.

greg k-h

> ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
> 
> >From 723aae25d5cdb09962901d36d526b44d4be1051c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Milton Miller <[email protected]>
> Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 13:27:17 -0600
> Subject: [PATCH] smp_call_function_many: handle concurrent clearing of mask
> 
> Mike Galbraith reported finding a lockup ("perma-spin bug") where the
> cpumask passed to smp_call_function_many was cleared by other cpu(s)
> while a cpu was preparing its call_data block, resulting in no cpu to
> clear the last ref and unlock the block.
> 
> Having cpus clear their bit asynchronously could be useful on a mask of
> cpus that might have a translation context, or cpus that need a push to
> complete an rcu window.
> 
> Instead of adding a BUG_ON and requiring yet another cpumask copy, just
> detect the race and handle it.
> 
> Note: arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask must still handle an empty
> cpumask because the data block is globally visible before the that arch
> callback is made.  And (obviously) there are no guarantees to which cpus
> are notified if the mask is changed during the call; only cpus that were
> online and had their mask bit set during the whole call are guaranteed
> to be called.
> 
> Reported-by: Mike Galbraith <[email protected]>
> Reported-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Jan Beulich <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Milton Miller <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/smp.c b/kernel/smp.c
> index 7c6ded5..9545489 100644
> --- a/kernel/smp.c
> +++ b/kernel/smp.c
> @@ -450,7 +450,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
>  {
>       struct call_function_data *data;
>       unsigned long flags;
> -     int cpu, next_cpu, this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> +     int refs, cpu, next_cpu, this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
>  
>       /*
>        * Can deadlock when called with interrupts disabled.
> @@ -461,7 +461,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
>       WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_online(this_cpu) && irqs_disabled()
>                    && !oops_in_progress && !early_boot_irqs_disabled);
>  
> -     /* So, what's a CPU they want? Ignoring this one. */
> +     /* Try to fastpath.  So, what's a CPU they want? Ignoring this one. */
>       cpu = cpumask_first_and(mask, cpu_online_mask);
>       if (cpu == this_cpu)
>               cpu = cpumask_next_and(cpu, mask, cpu_online_mask);
> @@ -519,6 +519,13 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
>       /* We rely on the "and" being processed before the store */
>       cpumask_and(data->cpumask, mask, cpu_online_mask);
>       cpumask_clear_cpu(this_cpu, data->cpumask);
> +     refs = cpumask_weight(data->cpumask);
> +
> +     /* Some callers race with other cpus changing the passed mask */
> +     if (unlikely(!refs)) {
> +             csd_unlock(&data->csd);
> +             return;
> +     }
>  
>       raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&call_function.lock, flags);
>       /*
> @@ -532,7 +539,7 @@ void smp_call_function_many(const struct cpumask *mask,
>        * to the cpumask before this write to refs, which indicates
>        * data is on the list and is ready to be processed.
>        */
> -     atomic_set(&data->refs, cpumask_weight(data->cpumask));
> +     atomic_set(&data->refs, refs);
>       raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&call_function.lock, flags);
>  
>       /*
> 
> _______________________________________________
> stable mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to