2.6.35-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------
From: Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]>

commit 4e5518ca53be29c1ec3c00089c97bef36bfed515 upstream.

pcmcia_request_irq() and pcmcia_enable_device() are intended
to be called from process context (first function allocate memory
with GFP_KERNEL, second take a mutex). We can not take spin lock
and call them.

It's safe to move spin lock after pcmcia_enable_device() as we
still hold off IRQ until dev->base_addr is 0 and driver will
not proceed with interrupts when is not ready.

Patch resolves:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643758

Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: John W. Linville <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <[email protected]>


---
 drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_cs.c |   15 ++++-----------
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6.35.y/drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_cs.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.35.y.orig/drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_cs.c 2011-03-29 
22:51:42.422637681 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.35.y/drivers/net/wireless/hostap/hostap_cs.c      2011-03-29 
23:02:59.610310141 -0700
@@ -626,15 +626,9 @@
        local->hw_priv = hw_priv;
        hw_priv->link = link;
 
-       /*
-        * Make sure the IRQ handler cannot proceed until at least
-        * dev->base_addr is initialized.
-        */
-       spin_lock_irqsave(&local->irq_init_lock, flags);
-
        ret = pcmcia_request_irq(link, prism2_interrupt);
        if (ret)
-               goto failed_unlock;
+               goto failed;
 
        /*
         * This actually configures the PCMCIA socket -- setting up
@@ -643,11 +637,12 @@
         */
        ret = pcmcia_request_configuration(link, &link->conf);
        if (ret)
-               goto failed_unlock;
+               goto failed;
 
+       /* IRQ handler cannot proceed until at dev->base_addr is initialized */
+       spin_lock_irqsave(&local->irq_init_lock, flags);
        dev->irq = link->irq;
        dev->base_addr = link->io.BasePort1;
-
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&local->irq_init_lock, flags);
 
        /* Finally, report what we've done */
@@ -676,8 +671,6 @@
 
        return ret;
 
- failed_unlock:
-        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&local->irq_init_lock, flags);
  failed:
        kfree(hw_priv);
        prism2_release((u_long)link);

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to