On 04/05/2011 09:34 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Do you mean during resume?
>
> I think we can try to make the ordering more appropriate, but I'm not really
> sure it would be a good idea to do that in the same patch. Probably not.
>
> Also, our current ordering has never been reported to cause problems to
> anyone.
>
Yes, I mean on resume.
I'm not sure if we'd know since it would manifest as a very early failure.
Anyway, agreed it's not the same patch.
Two things:
1. Do you agree that this is the right place to put this? There seems
to be some other things in __save_processor_state() which puts things in
places outside struct saved_context, but I would like your opinion.
2. While we're at it, why is mtrr_save_fixed_ranges() only called on x86-32?
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
