On 04/14/2011 02:56 PM, Greg KH wrote: > On Thu, Apr 14, 2011 at 02:43:01PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: >> The FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT flag was not getting set, causing the restart_block to >> restart futex_wait() without a timeout after a signal. >> >> Commit b41277dc7a18ee332d in 2.6.38 introduced the regression by accidentally >> removing the the FLAGS_HAS_TIMEOUT assignment from futex_wait() during the >> setup >> of the restart block. Restore the originaly behavior. >> >> Fixes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32922 >> >> V2: Added references to commit message. >> V3: Set flag during restart block instead of do_futex() >> V4: Correct stupid order of assignment mistake pointed out by Eric >> >> Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <[email protected]> >> Reported-by: Tim Smith <[email protected]> >> Reported-by: Torsten Hilbrich <[email protected]> >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> >> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]> >> Cc: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]> >> CC: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]> >> CC: John Kacur <[email protected]> >> --- > > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the > stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt > for how to do this properly.
Sigh, apologies. Fixing, will add stable to CC: in changelog. Gives me a chance to improve the subject anyway. Ingo, Greg, please ignore this and the previous V[123] patches. -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center Yocto Project - Linux Kernel _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
