Hello everybody,

I'm trying to solve strange issue, today, my fourth machine running 2.6.32.21 
just crashed. What makes the cases similar, apart fromn same kernel version is 
that all boxes had very similar uptimes: 214, 216, 216, and 224 days. This 
might just be a coincidence, but I think this might be important.

Unfortunately I only have backtraces of two crashes (and those are trimmed, 
sorry), and they do not look as similar as I'd like, but still maybe there is 
something in common:

[<ffffffff81120cc7>] pollwake+0x57/0x60 
[<ffffffff81046720>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x10 
[<ffffffff8103683a>] __wake_up_common+0x5a/0x90 
[<ffffffff8103a313>] __wake_up+0x43/0x70 
[<ffffffffa0321573>] process_masterspan+0x643/0x670 [dahdi] 
[<ffffffffa0326595>] coretimer_func+0x135/0x1d0 [dahdi] 
[<ffffffff8105d74d>] run_timer_softirq+0x15d/0x320 
[<ffffffffa0326460>] ? coretimer_func+0x0/0x1d0 [dahdi] 
[<ffffffff8105690c>] __do_softirq+0xcc/0x220 
[<ffffffff8100c40c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30 
[<ffffffff8100e3ba>] do_softirq+0x4a/0x80 
[<ffffffff810567c7>] irq_exit+0x87/0x90 
[<ffffffff8100d7b7>] do_IRQ+0x77/0xf0 
[<ffffffff8100bc53>] ret_from_intr+0x0/Oxa 
<EUI> [<ffffffffa019e556>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x273/0x2a1 [processor] 
[<ffffffffa019e54c>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0x269/0x2a1 [processor] 
[<ffffffff81280095>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xa5/0x150 
[<ffffffff8100a18f>] ? cpu_idle+0x4f/0x90 
[<ffffffff81323c95>] ? rest_init+0x75/0x80 
[<ffffffff81582d7f>] ? start_kernel+0x2ef/0x390 
[<ffffffff81582271>] ? x86_64_start_reservations+0x81/0xc0 
[<ffffffff81582386>] ? x86_64_start_kernel+0xd6/0x100 

this box (actually two of the crashed ones) is using dahdi_dummy module to 
generate timing for asterisk SW pbx, so maybe it's related to it.


[<ffffffff810a5063>] handle_IRQ_event+0x63/0x1c0
[<ffffffff810a71ae>] handle_edge_irq+0xce/0x160
[<ffffffff8100e1bf>] handle_irq+0x1f/0x30                                       
                                                                                
                       
[<ffffffff8100d7ae>] do_IRQ+0x6e/0xf0
[<ffffffff8100bc53>] ret_from_intr+0x0/Oxa
<EUI> [<ffffffff8133?f?f>] ? _spin_un1ock_irq+0xf/0x40
[<ffffffff81337f79>] ? _spin_un1ock_irq+0x9/0x40
[<ffffffff81064b9a>] ? exit_signals+0x8a/0x130
[<ffffffff8105372e>] ? do_exit+0x7e/0x7d0
[<ffffffff8100f8a7>] ? oops_end+0xa7/0xb0
[<ffffffff8100faa6>] ? die+0x56/0x90
[<ffffffff8100c810>] ? do_trap+0x130/0x150
[<ffffffff8100ccca>] ? do_divide_error+0x8a/0xa0
[<ffffffff8103d227>] ? find_busiest_group+0x3d7/0xa00
[<ffffffff8104400b>] ? cpuacct_charge+0x6b/0x90
[<ffffffff8100c045>] ? divide_error+0x15/0x20
[<ffffffff8103d227>] ? find_busiest_group+0x3d7/0xa00
[<ffffffff8103cfff>] ? find_busiest_group+0x1af/0xa00
[<ffffffff81335483>] ? thread_return+0x4ce/0x7bb
[<ffffffff8133bec5>] ? do_nanosleep+0x75/0x30
[<ffffffff810?1?4e>] ? hrtimer_nanosleep+0x9e/0x120
[<ffffffff810?08f0>] ? hrtimer_wakeup+0x0/0x30
[<ffffffff810?183f>] ? sys_nanosleep+0x6f/0x80

another two don't use it. only similarity I see here is that it seems to be IRQ 
handling related, but both issues don't have anything in common.
Does anybody have an idea on where should I look? Of course I should update all 
those boxes to (at least) latest 2.6.32.x, and I'll do it for sure, but still 
I'd first like to know where the problem was, and if it has been fixed, or how 
to fix it...
I'd be gratefull for any help...
BR
nik


-- 
-------------------------------------
Ing. Nikola CIPRICH
LinuxBox.cz, s.r.o.
28. rijna 168, 709 01 Ostrava

tel.:   +420 596 603 142
fax:    +420 596 621 273
mobil:  +420 777 093 799
www.linuxbox.cz

mobil servis: +420 737 238 656
email servis: [email protected]
-------------------------------------

Attachment: pgp9ElhTRUgof.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to