commit: 5035b20fa5cd146b66f5f89619c20a4177fb736d
From: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:08:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] workqueue: fix deadlock in worker_maybe_bind_and_lock()

If a rescuer and stop_machine() bringing down a CPU race with each
other, they may deadlock on non-preemptive kernel.  The CPU won't
accept a new task, so the rescuer can't migrate to the target CPU,
while stop_machine() can't proceed because the rescuer is holding one
of the CPU retrying migration.  GCWQ_DISASSOCIATED is never cleared
and worker_maybe_bind_and_lock() retries indefinitely.

This problem can be reproduced semi reliably while the system is
entering suspend.

 http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1122051

A lot of kudos to Thilo-Alexander for reporting this tricky issue and
painstaking testing.

stable: This affects all kernels with cmwq, so all kernels since and
        including v2.6.36 need this fix.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Reported-by: Thilo-Alexander Ginkel <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Thilo-Alexander Ginkel <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
---
 kernel/workqueue.c |    8 +++++++-
 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 04ef830..e3378e8 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -1291,8 +1291,14 @@ __acquires(&gcwq->lock)
                        return true;
                spin_unlock_irq(&gcwq->lock);
 
-               /* CPU has come up inbetween, retry migration */
+               /*
+                * We've raced with CPU hot[un]plug.  Give it a breather
+                * and retry migration.  cond_resched() is required here;
+                * otherwise, we might deadlock against cpu_stop trying to
+                * bring down the CPU on non-preemptive kernel.
+                */
                cpu_relax();
+               cond_resched();
        }
 }
 

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to