> @@ -168,8 +168,13 @@ int __read_mostly timekeeping_suspended;
>  static struct timespec xtime_cache __attribute__ ((aligned (16)));
>  void update_xtime_cache(u64 nsec)
>  {
> -     xtime_cache = xtime;
> -     timespec_add_ns(&xtime_cache, nsec);
> +     /*
> +      * Use temporary variable so get_seconds() cannot catch
> +      * an intermediate xtime_cache.tv_sec value.
> +      */
> +     struct timespec ts = xtime;
> +     timespec_add_ns(&ts, nsec);

There's nothing to stop the compiler's optimizer to use memory accesses
directly again. Something similar to ACCESS_ONCE (that is essentially a 
volatile cast) may be required to be fully future proof.

-Andi

_______________________________________________
stable mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable

Reply via email to