On Tue, 10 May 2011 11:09:54 +0100 Mel Gorman <[email protected]> wrote:
> include/linux/gfp.h and include/trace/events/gfpflags.h is out of > sync. When tracing is enabled, certain flags are not recognised and > the text output is less useful as a result. Add the missing flags. > > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <[email protected]> > --- > include/trace/events/gfpflags.h | 6 +++++- > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/trace/events/gfpflags.h b/include/trace/events/gfpflags.h > index e3615c0..9fe3a366 100644 > --- a/include/trace/events/gfpflags.h > +++ b/include/trace/events/gfpflags.h > @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@ > */ > #define show_gfp_flags(flags) > \ > (flags) ? __print_flags(flags, "|", \ > + {(unsigned long)GFP_TRANSHUGE, "GFP_TRANSHUGE"}, \ > {(unsigned long)GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE, "GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE"}, \ > {(unsigned long)GFP_HIGHUSER, "GFP_HIGHUSER"}, \ > {(unsigned long)GFP_USER, "GFP_USER"}, \ > @@ -32,6 +33,9 @@ > {(unsigned long)__GFP_HARDWALL, "GFP_HARDWALL"}, \ > {(unsigned long)__GFP_THISNODE, "GFP_THISNODE"}, \ > {(unsigned long)__GFP_RECLAIMABLE, "GFP_RECLAIMABLE"}, \ > - {(unsigned long)__GFP_MOVABLE, "GFP_MOVABLE"} \ > + {(unsigned long)__GFP_MOVABLE, "GFP_MOVABLE"}, \ > + {(unsigned long)__GFP_NOTRACK, "GFP_NOTRACK"}, \ > + {(unsigned long)__GFP_NO_KSWAPD, "GFP_NO_KSWAPD"}, \ > + {(unsigned long)__GFP_OTHER_NODE, "GFP_OTHER_NODE"} \ > ) : "GFP_NOWAIT" The patch seems somewhat needed in 2.6.38.x, but 2.6.38 doesn't have __GFP_OTHER_NODE. So if you think this needs fixing in -stable, please prepare a separate patch for that. _______________________________________________ stable mailing list [email protected] http://linux.kernel.org/mailman/listinfo/stable
